![]() At 6.3 and 6.7 that margin of error becomes smaller. I agree on all counts except at 5.7 one can work with those issues. So, you decided to make Gaijin Entertainments War Thunder your go-to vehicle-based combat simulator, huh You poor unfortunate soul, you. Only thing I'd say the IS-2 is better is the HE filler and the mobility in general. Haven't talked about the optics also, Tiger 2 has better optics than the IS-2. The reload on the IS-2 also stinks plus has less penn. You can really on the armor unlike the IS-2. ![]() I've seen so much of German teammates or opponents be blind to the environment.Īnyways, I feel like the Tiger 2 should be more consistent in performance. If you have a high-end smartphone, you can enjoy this games high-definition graphics, thanks to. Sadly you should factor in your average German teammates at that BR. Without a doubt, War Thunder Mobiles graphics are spectacular. Sure there are a few heavy tanks a little later in some tech trees but they dont have the staying power anymore, they basically become oversized slow medium tanks. Much higher and the armor just doesnt keep up with the cost in size and mobility. ~5.7-6.0 is imo the pinnacle of heavy tank game play. And I love a DShK as much as the next guy but it isnt worth stepping up to 6.3 over. ![]() The best I've ever been able to figure the main difference between the IS-2 and the IS-2 '44 is the DShK. Not because the IS-2 is better but because the IS-2 is better at it's 5.7 RB. ![]() Tiger II P vs IS 2 '44 I would say Tiger II Pīoth Tigers are objectively better than the IS-2.īut Tiger II P vs IS-2. Originally posted by Toblm:Tiger II H vs IS 2 '44 I would say Tiger II H ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |